Teams Eclipse

Single Counterparty Credit Limit (SCCL)

SCCL’s intent is to limit “net credit exposures” of an entire consolidated firm (banking organizations), to a single counterparty, to a specified percentage of the firm’s eligible capital base. The link between large banks and their counterparties is a concern SCCL aims to address to reduce the threat to overall financial stability. SCCL applies to large and mid-tier US banks and a large number of foreign banks across (both, IHC and non-IHC FBOs). In total, approx. 10+ US banks and 75+ FBOs.

Under SCCL, net exposure is calculated across a group of counterparties where their financial statements are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. Net exposure is measured against the bank’s tier 1 capital. Once net exposure exceeds 5% of tier 1 capital, additional counterparties are required to be grouped based on economic interdependencies and control relationships. SCCL reporting for FBOs covers CUSO booked exposures only. SCCL allows FBO’s to achieve “rule equivalency” by providing the home offices equivalent regulatory reporting to the FRB. The process and timing to achieve equivalency are tied to multiple challenges.

Eclipse’s team/SMEs interacted with multiple banks to efficiently & effectively address SCCL:

FR 2590 quarterly reporting schedules. Schedules are still in DRAFT form. The FRB is expected to issue the final version later in 2019. "Daily compliance" is required under the SCCL rule but there is no prescribed daily reporting.

Summary of net Credit exposure for top 50 Counterparties

Note: Additional details and complex counterparty grouping is required in schedules A1 and A2 for those counterparties where the exposure of what is booked exceeds 5% of the group’s tier 1 capital.

Our Value

Our Value

An early on “study and analysis” period allowed for an early view of the challenges with the rule’s requirements and the rule’s implementation. This in turn allowed for better planning and a timely delivery.

A structured focus on data sourcing analysis and acquisition including exposure calculations per the rule resulted in a more efficient delivery and minimal rework during the test phases.

A robust governance engaging core stakeholders (including head office stakeholder layer for FBOs) allowed for a swift response to challenges and a streamlined decision making.

Case Studies